An Inconvenient Truth

Most documentaries like An Inconvenient Truth movie that research and discusses an important issue for climate change. Although it is a powerful picture of global warming and its impacts. In this essay I will outline the positives and the negatives of this movie.
Lots of people were disagreeing for the movie. Their points were in the movie’s aim goal; Al Gore’s presenting his knowledge of global warming. Helen mentioned that Al Gore was very interesting because he mixed it with jokes (O’Hara 1). On the other hand, Al Gore’s presenting makes the movie more attractive. For example, treating his listeners like adult and his enthusiastic manner. His charts, statistic and scientists studies prove that the global warming is not new fact. They hold up their belief by quite a few outstanding climate researchers who says that Al Gore got the science right.
The criticisms alongside An Inconvenient Truth were based on Al Gore’s mistake, unnecessary facts and ignore others. Al Gore useless a lot of time to tell them that the global warming is happening. Then he concludes that the people action is the cause with no any proof or verification which is a basic error. According to Scott there were unnecessary information about his personal life, his sister and his child make some people think that the film was a commercial campaign for Al Gore (Scott 1). In their opinion the rain forest’s damage is the main provider to the global warming which the film practically ignores it.
In conclusion, the movie is desirable to watch because of its important reason, which is to make the people alert about the risk of the global warming’s effect. I think that we all must work together in order to look after our earth from this calamity.